The Poisoning Of Wells – Chemical Warfare Continued

Dear Mayor Brown and Airdrie City Council,

Thank-you to those of you that replied to concerns on the involuntary, mandated mass medication of Airdrie’s water supply with a known industrial waste and neurotoxin. I was reluctant to read them knowing that you would double down on the misinformed and underinformed narratives that you choose to promote or genuinely believe. Given your collective resistance to consider, accept or act on the existing and growing evidence that fluoride offers yet another insult and harm to the human body and affects cognitive function, especially in children, perhaps you could consider that you might somehow be collectively experiencing the effects of overexposure to the chemicals that you are willing to impose on us. I do not say this to be insulting or unkind but to direct you to the information items below, one titled ‘The Dangers of Fluoride on the Brain and I.Q.’ from the DHRU PUROHIT podcast. The proven information in this item is not new but it sums up the issue so that it can be easily understood.

Further:

There are also many significant studies suggesting that fluoride can increase the body’s absorption of aluminum, particularly in the brain. Studies on animals have indicated that when fluoride and aluminum are present together, they can form complexes (such as aluminum fluoride), which can cross the blood-brain barrier more easily than aluminum alone. Some research has determined that this could contribute to neurotoxic effects, potentially linking fluoride exposure to conditions like Alzheimer’s disease or Dementia. This is still a debated topic in the scientific community, with no definitive consensus just yet. Since it is then reasonable to be on the safe side, you might consider reducing intake from sources like fluoridated water, aluminum cookware, and certain processed foods.

Further:

I can’t decide which statement might be more impactful for you but they both raise the issue of moral code:

‘I can’t believe that you would ignore the evidence of the harms of fluoridation and collectively allow neurotoxins and other poisonous chemicals into our water supply, ones that could potentially pose a health risk to all people, especially foetuses, infants, nursing mothers and the elderly.’

OR:

‘I can believe that you would ignore the evidence of the harms of fluoridation and collectively allow neurotoxins and other poisonous chemicals into our water supply, ones that could potentially pose a health risk to all people, especially foetuses, infants, nursing mothers and the elderly.’

  A moral code, refers to a set of principles or rules that guide behavior endorsed by a society, group, or individual, or specifically in this case, a municipal bureaucratic body. To allow a known, harmful neurotoxin into the City of Airdrie’s water supply through involuntary mass medical intervention without comprehension or acknowledgement of the risks shows a lack of any moral code. The concept of a moral code is closely tied to the idea of comprehension and highlights the role of understanding, or lack thereof, and reasoning in adhering to a moral code. Where is your collective moral code on this issue? A lack of moral code approaches the realm of Evil, which by one definition, is being malfeasant and acting out or allowing morally incorrect behavior or policy that may cause harm, pain, or suffering. 

To Ponder:

“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”

― Max Planck, Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers

Documents:

 Below is a quote from your letter of  Mar.25 and the official response from the MOMA dated  Mar.13. It conflicts with your assertion that you are collectively powerless to stop the poisoning of our water with industrial waste.

“Also, I would argue your fight is not with municipality. It’s with the Canadian government and the Alberta government who allow municipalities to be inject fluoride, into the water supply”. – Peter Brown

From the MOMA:

“Dear Mr. Neitsch:

Thank you for your email of February 27, 2025, to the Honourable Danielle Smith, Premier of Alberta, my Caucus colleagues, and me, regarding the use of fluoride in water systems in Alberta. I am pleased to respond on behalf of the Government of Alberta.

Under the Municipal Government Act, municipalities are charged with the responsibility to provide good government, services, facilities, and other things council deems necessary or desirable for the people in the municipality. Decisions regarding water fluoridation fall within the legislated authority of the City of Airdrie.

While Alberta Health allows fluoridation for municipal drinking water, it is ultimately up to municipal councils to decide whether to fluoridate drinking water for oral health.   Municipalities must follow provincial regulations on drinking water safety and quality and may choose to provide fluoridated drinking water in accordance with the Potable Water Regulation (Section 12) under the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act. 

For more information about fluoride use in our water supply in Alberta, please visit: Position Statement on Community Water Fluoridation: July 2022 Update.

As this matter falls within the responsibility of your municipal council, you may want to share your concerns directly with City of Airdrie Council. Information on communicating with your council is available at Engage with City Council.

Thank you again for writing.

Sincerely, 

Ric McIver

Minister”

cc:      Honourable Danielle Smith, Premier of Alberta

Honourable Martin Long, Minister of Infrastructure

Honourable Adriana LaGrange, Minister of Health

Honourable Pete Guthrie, MLA, Airdrie-Cochrane

Closing:  

The decision to not introduce a toxic industrial waste and neurotoxin of any kind, in any amount should be an easy one to make for any ethical and considerate municipal council. There are more reasons and evidence to not fluoridate than there are to do so, not the least of which is our right to fully informed consent and the right to not be forced into mass medication.

Sincerely,

Al Neitsch

Airdrie, Windsong

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780080434056500402

For Your Review:

THEY JUST BANNED FLUORIDE IN PUBLIC DRINKING WATER

 THE FIRST STATE IN THE USA HAS INTRODUCED A FLUORIDE BAN – Peter Imanuelsen, Mar.30,2025

Well, this was quite unexpected.

The U.S state of Utah has become the first state to officially ban the practice of adding fluoride to public drinking water.

Now, to Europeans this might sound weird, as this isn’t a common practice in Europe.

But in the USA they have been adding fluoride to the drinking water as they claim it will improve public health by reducing cavities.

However, many people have been skeptical of this practice of adding it directly to drinking water where people ingest it.

Of course, those people skeptical of it have for many decades been labelled ”crazy conspiracy theorists” by the mainstream media.

Even now, the mainstream media is very upset at this new ban.

RFK Jr. said in November that he would advise all US water systems to remove fluoride from public water, saying that the chemical is ”industrial waste”.

Around 63% of people in the USA have fluoride added to their water supply.

Let me give you some uncomfortable facts that the mainstream media doesn’t want to tell you about fluoride.

Last year a new BOMBSHELL government report found that fluoride can in fact lower IQ in children.

Researchers found that people drinking water that contains more than 1.5mg of fluoride per liter of water is linked to a lowering of as much as 5 IQ points in children.

But the safe limit for fluoride in drinking water is set by the WHO at exactly 1.5mg!

Meanwhile, the recommended limit by federal health officials in the USA is at 0.7mg. However, until 2015 that was at 1.2mg. So very close to the range where researchers now have found can affect the IQ of children.

But unlike what many people think, the fluoride added to drinking water isn’t the natural version found in nature called calcium fluoride.

Fluoride usually comes as a byproduct of aluminum, fertilizer and iron ore manufacturing.

The version used in drinking water is called hexafluorosilic acid, which can also be found in rust remover products. It is a highly corrosive chemical.

In toothpaste they use something called sodium fluoride. It is a synthetic chemical and is classified as toxic by inhalation and ingestion on Wikipedia.

So why are people being forced to consume this chemical that is added directly to the water supply in many places?

Sounds like a much better option to simply let people choose themselves and get fluoride toothpaste if they wish.

It is important to note however that fluoride in toothpaste does indeed help against cavities. But there are now also other products on the market containing a non-toxic chemical called hydroxyapatite, which is shown to be safe and efficient against cavities.

Turns out that Florida, Ohio and South Carolina are also considering similar measures regarding banning fluoride in the drinking water.