Dear Leader Letter #6 – The Great Ronald MacDonald House Un-injected Patient and Family Eviction Backpeddaling Scandal
Poly Tics . Social StudiesHello Mayor Brown, City Council, Directors and Managers,
Re. The Ronald McDonald House Backpedaling Scandal,
Ronald Mcdonald House was very quick to back away or re frame the announcement on their website. I called a few of them too and, of course, by the time the event hit the mainstream, they were in damage control and had several different spins on their actions. The news was actually picked up by mainstream news as well and made headlines across the world. No matter how you frame their announcement, the intent is to either coerce any un-vaccinated family members into getting injections so that residents can continue to stay at R.M.H. or to further segregate the un-injected.
The larger issue is that cancer is an autoimmune disease. People, including children, are highly susceptible to viral infections like cold or flu, which CV-19 is proven to be a variant of. It’s also a fact that the experimental injections are proving to be of little use in preventing transmission or infection. They are in fact proven to compromise natural immunity in all people, including children, making them even more susceptible to infection. Why AHS and other ‘health’ corporations and their big PHARMA influencers are telling cancer patients that the injections are safe and effective can only lead one to question their motives for doing so. Most cancer patients participate in informed consent before undergoing treatment because there are always possible harmful or fatal side effects to treatments from highly toxic chemicals and radiation. Oddly, most cancer drugs have had to undergo vigorous long and short term studies before they are approved for use. Not so the experimental bio-agents being rolled out now. I went through the process. I’m still going through it. I know a bit about it. I had to decide whether to go with conventional treatment, for which there was some data to at least provide a prognosis, or, natural and homeopathic approaches where outcomes were not as easily available. Now AHS is trying to tell me that these experimental bio-agents are safe and effective for me but they cannot tell me why and they cannot tell me what their contents are. There are no long term studies on any of the injections. If it cannot cure or prevent cancer but is proven to damage natural immunity, why would I or any other informed person, with cancer or not, give in to it? That the uninformed or desperately afraid give in screams coercion of the worst kind by criminal psychopaths.
Sick children and their parents and families are particularly vulnerable to the coercion to comply. This coercion is disgusting and despicable and will only become more existential if people don’t wake up and stand against it. My daughters are sick now after giving uninformed consent to the experimental injections. We will never know what these experimental bio-agents are going to do to them long term until it happens. What kind of life is that for anyone? Their bodies are no longer their own. Same goes for anyone who took the injections. People are now controlled by what they have, without informed consent, allowed into their bodies. So who owns them now? There are psychological implications as well.
My/Our letters to you intend to bring you closer to realizing that this ‘pandemic’ agenda isn’t as much about public health as it is about controlling people into compliance. The fact that the highly incentivized mainstream media is freely promoting the agenda and that highly qualified data, debate, and opinion are being censored and suppressed should be enough to give you pause and replace your fear with courage. This is a propaganda and public relations war against all people.
Here are the ‘non-Googled’ links to media reports on the R.M.H. that I recently sent with excerpts from them for clarity. For them to deny what they said after they said it is criminal.
“Austin Furgason, the father of a four-year-old being treated for cancer, received a letter from a senior director at Ronald McDonald House’s Heather Street location, outlining an updated COVID-19 vaccination policy. The charity that provides housing and support for families with children facing serious medical issues will soon require anyone staying at or visiting the BC & Yukon facilities to show proof of vaccination. The new mandate will be in effect by January 17.”
https://joepags.com/news/ronald-mcdonald-house-to-evict-families-with-children-who-are-unvaccinated/
“On the recommendation of public health, the 14 member Board of Directors made the decision to mandate vaccinations for everyone working, visiting, or staying at RMH BC & Yukon to ensure we meet the highest standards of health and safety and protect the vulnerable population we serve,” the statement said. “We appreciate that this policy will impact those who have made a decision not to vaccinate however, the overall health and welfare of all our residents is our primary concern.”
“True North news obtained a copy of the letter, which stated that the vaccine mandate will begin on January 17 and “families already in the House/Family Room” will be given until January 31 to receive “minimum one dose.”
The letter told recipients to “visit our front desk to scan your BC vaccination passport, confirming proof of vaccination or provide the vaccination card for those under 12 years of age.”
The COVID jab policy applies to “everyone five years and older who are working, staying, or visiting our facilities.”
“Beginning Jan. 17, 2022, everyone five years and older who are working, staying or visiting our facilities, both the House at 4567 Heather St. Vancouver and at the Family Room in Surrey Memorial Hospital, must show proof of full vaccination (two doses),” said a letter from Ronald McDonald House to the Furgasons and other guests”
“Another father of a child undergoing cancer treatment told CTV News the new policy caught him and his wife off guard.
“It was a little shocking, for sure,” Brian Blakely said.
His five-year-old son Andrew has since been given a (doctor’s exemption), which will allow him to stay at RMH until he enters remission.
Blakely and his wife are both vaccinated, but the new mandate will force him to stay in the Okanagan with his eight-year-old daughter, who is currently unvaccinated.
He says he thinks RMH could have found a better way to notify families of the new rules, but remains grateful for all they offer.”
“The charity responded with a statement on Thursday confirming that most children over age five and their families need proof of vaccination as of Jan. 31, the end of a two-week grace period for the change, but said: “No family will ever be evicted from our house.”
The statement also said, “Our team has been in contact with the family in regards to this specific situation, and we are supporting arrangements for (alternative) accommodations.”
That ‘alternative measures or arrangements’ need to be entertained is as alarming as Paul Schultze’s comments about addressing ‘backlash’ to mandatory injections for City of Airdrie employees and then claiming that there was very little resistance to the mandates. Fear of losing employment and benefits is a great motivator to comply and to assert that there was little hesitancy or complaint is tone deaf. That tax dollars support tone deafness and wilful blindness is peak hypocrisy and contributes to peak tyranny.
Here are a few more verifiably truthful links:
Dr. Simone Gold – The truth about the CV19 vaccine – Jan. 2021
Two years on and the truth is still the same.
Dr. Jensen – Where is the Science when the rules are always changing 05.27.21
Consider that the AHS will not allow physicians, my oncologists and hematologists included, to order antibody testing for me. A rational and ethical ‘health’ bureaucrat or physician should want to know whether I had any natural immunity, injected or not.
I’m not sorry to be so long in the correspondence to you, whether you respond or not. I’m not a doctor or a lawyer but I hope to have the humanity to understand that what is happening is medically unethical and unlawful. I/We hope to grow in number and to bring elected and non-elected bureaucrats to a similar understanding, and to act with courage and reason to put a stop to this madness.
Sincerely,
Al Neitsch
What is there left to say in regards to the coercion and lack of informed consent, around an experimental medical procedure for an illness with a virtual guarantee of recovering from, if you even catch it.
“Madness” sums up the situation perfectly.