Broken By Design : How Cultural Marxist Elites Engineered The Collapse Of The American Family

I’ll file the following under ‘I wish I’d said that’. I couldn’t have said it better. I may have said similar things but but this screed sums up everything I see as being why we are where we are as a society. I cannot fully identify who wrote these words but it is a script that accompanied a post on BitChute titled, ‘Broken by Design: How Elites Engineered the Collapse of the American Family’, from a channel called ‘The Report’. This piece could easily be thrown into a category of ‘Zionist Globalist Takeover Conspiracy’ but determine for yourself whether it’s true to you amid the undeniable truths presented. You will either see it or you won’t. Substitute America with Canada or any other western culture. The destruction of the nuclear and extended family plays into the ultimate tyranny of Cultural Marxist, Corporate Globalist tyranny and control. When you destroy the traditional family you make children vulnerable to conflicting narratives and influences of gender, sexual and racial ideologies that target the young, making them prey for predators and pedophiles, to sexualize and confuse them into becoming immoral and undisciplined and compliant adults ; perfect fodder for a totalitarian, depopulated New world Order. We went from traditional families to bra burning and post natal abortions and MAiD in Canada solutions to planned economic and social dysfunction in two generations.

Progress?

The Piece –

“The American family didn’t just drift apart; it was dismantled systematically, piece by piece, law by law, frame by frame on your television screen, word by word in our textbooks and now we’re watching the fallout in real time. Depression, addictions, suicides, sexual dysfunction, broken relationships, spiritual confusion and a nation full of citizens who don’t even know what a home is supposed to feel like anymore.

Let’s go back. Picture post world war two America, the strongest economy on earth. Families were intact. Fathers led, mothers nurtured, grandparents were honored, not warehoused in facilities. Kids had a lineage, a last name they were proud of. They were raised by a community that cared. Church attendance was sky high. Neighbors knew each other. Marriage was sacred, not just celebrated but expected. Divorce was rare and it wasn’t casual, not because people were trapped but because they believed in holding things together.

So what happened? The answer starts in 1969. Governor Ronald Reagan, a conservative icon, signed America’s first no fault divorce law in the state of California. He later admitted that it was the greatest political mistake of his life. Why? Because that one law cracked the foundation. It told couples, you don’t need a reason, you don’t need a real grievance, just say I’m unhappy and the family courts will split you up. No fight, no attempt to reconcile, and those courts, they didn’t protect fathers, they didn’t preserve the family. They became a divorce industry, ripping families apart, re-distributing income and turning children into trophies for the state to preside over. By 1985 every single state in America had followed. Divorce rates exploded and just like that, we normalized broken homes. But where did the intellectual fuel come from?

Enter Betty Friedan, author of ‘The Feminine Mystique’, the book that lit the match for second wave feminism. What most Americans didn’t then know was that Friedan, born Betty Goldstein, had long standing ties to The Communist Party U.S.A., where she wrote for Marxist labor journals and framed the suburban housewife as a prisoner. She called the family home a comfortable concentration camp. That’s the language that shaped an entire generation of women. Her message? Your husband is your jailer. Your children are your captors. Your identity is only found outside the family.

Then came Gloria Steinem, the media darling of the feminist movement. She graced the cover of every magazine. She launched ‘Ms. Magazine’ and was hailed as a champion for women. But what the public didn’t know was that Steinem’s entire operation was bankrolled by The Central Intelligence Agency, the C.I.A., under a Cold War cultural project called ‘The Congress For Cultural Freedom’. Declassified documents confirm it. The goal? – undermine American Values from the inside out. Through Ms. Magazine, Steinem glorified single motherhood, trashed marriage, mocked homemakers and promoted casual sex as liberation. She famously said, “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” These weren’t fringe voices. These were the women shaping the narrative of college campuses, television talk shows and public schools. Their message was clear. Motherhood is slavery. Marriage is a trap. The home is a battlefield and if you want to be free, you have to break away from all of it.

Meanwhile on the political front, president Lyndon B. Johnson unleashed a legislative tsunami called, ‘The Great Society’. It was sold as a war on poverty but what it did was fund the mass fatherless home. Welfare benefits increased dramatically if a man was not present in the household. Entire communities were economically incentivised to remove the father figure. “You want help from the government?”, the fathers name better not be on the lease. What followed was decades of generational dependency, criminalization of men and the beginning of what we now call ‘The Fatherless Epidemic’. The assault didn’t stop at politics or academia. It came through the screen, every livingroom in America. Hollywood took the baton and ran. Enter Norman Lear, a Jewish American television mogul and the mastermind behind ‘All In The Family’, ‘Maude’, ‘One Day At A Time’, and ‘The Jeffersons’. These weren’t just sitcoms; they were social weapons. They portrayed fathers, especially working class men, as bigots, fools or irrelevant. They mocked religion, ridiculed masculinity and replaced respect for authority with snarky rebellion. Lears productions didn’t reflect the culture; they re-directed it with the support of powerful backers. Behind the scenes were corporate giants like The Ford Foundation and The Rockefeller Foundation, funding media, education programs and social science research that all echoed one message; break away from tradition, question the father, challenge the mother, redefine the home.

These weren’t just philantrophic grants, they were investments in cultural transformation. John D. Rockefeller the third was a powerful voice behind America’s push for population control, chaired The Commission On Population Growth and the American Future in the early 1970s. That commission concluded that there were too many people in The United States. Their solution? Push birth control, abortion and government incentives to shrink family size. The untimate goal was simple. Fewer families, more centralized power…and what institutions stepped in to carry that out? ‘Planned Parenthood’ founded by Margaret Sanger, a eugenicist who called for the sterilization of what she referred to as the unfit. That’s not conspiracy, that’s in her own writing. Planned Parenthood became more than a women’s health provider, it was an engine of cultural reset. They told women children were a burden, marriage is optional and men? ; they are unneccessary. Meanwhile the economic side of the war was unfolding. Once upon a time one income could support a household. A father could provide, a mother could raise. The family could thrive. But that model was quietly demolished. Economist Milton Friedman, architect of the Free Market Revolution and darling of Libertarian circles helped usher in Globalization and de-regulation. Entire American industries were outsourced. Manufacturing jobs, especially those held by working class men, vanished. Families who had once built their lives on stable wages were suddenly surviving paycheque to paycheque, if at all. Fathers were no longer providers. Mothers were forced into the workforce not by choice but by neccessity. And let’s talk education. The so-called father of modern schooling, John Dewey was a socialist who believed that children should be shaped by the state, not by parents. He called for schools to be engines of social change, not moral instruction, and that’s exactly what happened. Classrooms became idiological battlegrounds. God was removed. History was revised and the idea of right and wrong replaced by moral relativism. Students were no longer taught to honor their parents. They were taught to question them. The result? An entire generation that no longer sees the family as sacred but as optional. Once the family was broken, once fathers were gone, mothers were overburdened and children were raised by screens. What came next wasn’t healing. It was corruption. The institutions that shattered the home didn’t step back. They stepped in and sexualized the ruins. Pornography was mainstreamed. Incest themed content surged online. Step parent fantasies, baby sitter fetishes, the very roles once held sacred inside a family were twisted into objects of desire and pushed as entertainment. And who bankrolls the normalization of this madness? Billionaire activist, George Soros, through his ‘Open Society Foundations’. Soros poured hundreds of millions into organizations, pushing radical gender ideology, drag culture in schools, hormone therapy for minors and the dismantling of parental rights. His funding didn’t just support policy, it transformed institutions from academia to law, to children’s television. His vision of open societies demanded closed families because when you break down the walls of the home, the state can walk right in. And here’s where it got even darker. Government benefit systems, especially under programs designed in the wake of The Great Society rewarded women more if the father wasn’t present. They punished households that tried to stay intact. And school systems? They taught children to question everything except the state. Faith was bigoted. Masculinity toxic. Motherhood oppressive. Gender became a feeling. Family became fluid. Identity became confusion. And what happened to the kids? They were medicated. Over-prescribed. Spiritually lost. Sent into a digital world where validation was currency, trauma was esthetic. Boys turned to gangs, to porn, to nihilism, escapism. Girls turned to TikTok, to Sugardaddies, to Onlyfans because somewhere deep down they were still searching for the protection they never had. Calling older men ‘daddy’ wasn’t just kink, it was psychological residue from being abandoned by the very man that should have guarded their innocence. This wasn’t freedom. It was fragmentation. And while we mocked living with your parents after eighteen, the rest of the world kept their families close. In India, the Middle East, China and across Southeast Asia children stayed home until marriage. Three generations lived together. Grandparents raised grandchildren. Respect flows upward. Security flows downward. And the result? Lower suicide. Lower depression. Lower divorce. Fewer school shootings. Because they haven’t bought the lie that separation is strength. Even in the animal kingdom, mammals like us live in tribes, troops, packs, and herds. The young are raised by many. Protected. Guided. Formed. But we, we kicked our kids out at eighteen, called it independence.

And now we wonder why they’re lost, sexualized, suicidal and desperate for identity. And this wasn’t an accident. This was the plan. Because a strong family raises strong children. Strong children ask questions. They challenge authority. They think critically. They resist the state. So if you want total control over a population, you start by breaking the home and that’s what they did. From Steinem to Friedan. From Soros to Rockefeller. From Reagan’s ‘No Fault Divorce’ to Johnson’s ‘Great Society’. To Norman Lear’s Hollywood agenda. It was all co-ordinated and now we’re standing in the wreckage. But we can name it and when you name something you can fight it. Because if we don’t fight to restore what they broke, if we don’t defend the sacred structure of family, we will have nothing left to pass on because when the family falls, the nation follows. And that was always the plan.”

How’s that plan working so far?

Do we welcome the ‘post national state?

Do we ring in a depraved dystopian future?

Afterword From Howard:

It is a liberal, expensive and sometimes free education at ‘great’ universities and colleges that typically indoctrinates Cultural Marxist ‘rebels’ and ‘activists’. Socialism and social justice warriors and revisionists against colonial capitalists are ‘cool’ and more important than learning anything useful that might help build better societies. These institutions breed smart, snarky useful, generational idiots that still romanticise about Che Guevara. They have posters of him in their dorm rooms, and like him, rarely bathe, use drugs and have casual, unprotected sex to possibly generate babies to abort. They fantasize about being rebels and warriors that could fearlessly shoot pregnant women for the greater good and equity for all. In the past, they were brutal NPC cowards during the great revolutions and great leaps forward but have adopted Satanism and sodomy and equity and digital violence to advance their ’cause’.

“It is possible to be highly educated and at the same time morally depraved? There is, in fact, a certain kind of moral depravity that only the highly educated can attain, because it requires sophisticated skills of rationalization and self-deception.” – Iain W. Proven