The Poisoning of Wells – A Weapon of War
Poly Tics . Social Studies
From: “Al Neitsch” <awneitsch@hotmail.com>
To: “Office of the Premier” <Premier@gov.ab.ca>, “Health Minister” <Health.Minister@gov.ab.ca>, “Airdrie-Cochrane” <Airdrie.Cochrane@assembly.ab.ca>, “MA Minister” <Minister.MunicipalAffairs@gov.ab.ca>, “infrastructure minister” <infrastructure.minister@gov.ab.ca>
Cc: mayor@airdrie.ca, “Peter Brown” <Peter.Brown@airdrie.ca>, “tina petrow” <tina.petrow@airdrie.ca>, “Heather Spearman” <Heather.Spearman@airdrie.ca>, “ron chapman” <ron.chapman@airdrie.ca>, “al jones” <al.jones@airdrie.ca>, “darrell belyk” <darrell.belyk@airdrie.ca>, “Candice Kolson” <Candice.Kolson@airdrie.ca>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2025 9:50:26 AM
Subject: Fw: The Poisoning of Wells
To Our Elected and Unelected Public Servants,
Well poisoning is the act of malicious manipulation of potable water resources in order to cause illness or death, or to deny an opponent access to fresh water resources.
Well poisoning has been historically documented as a strategy during wartime or conflict, and was used offensively as a terror tactic to disrupt and depopulate a target area. It has been used defensively as a scorched earth tactic to deny an invading army sources of clean water. Rotting corpses of animals and humans and other toxic agents were thrown down wells, reservoirs and other water sources as one of the earliest examples of biological warfare.
During the 20th century, during the First World War, German forces poisoned wells in France and other parts of Europe they invaded and occupied. Israel poisoned the wells and water supplies of certain Palestinian towns and villages as part of a biological warfare program during the 1948 Palestine war, that successfully caused a typhoid epidemic. In the late 20th century, well-poisoning took place during the Kosovo Liberation War, and in the 21st century, when Israeli settlers again poisoned the wells of villages in occupied Palestine. Surely there are many more instances of well-poisoning in modern times but the act is so vile and heinous that cases are rarely investigated.
In an era of increasing managed and intentional water and food scarcity, the fundamental value of water to life makes tampering with the water supply an extremely effective target during domestic and global conflict. In our current ‘advanced and progressive’ world, water and food related violence is being added to the threat of economic and kinetic warfare. Hypocritical posturing by governments in support of human rights and democracy are in direct conflict with the push to control and manipulate the health and welfare of populations without informed consent. Government and corporate interests now want to mandate and regulate every aspect of what is important to sustain or end life. Our air, food and water is targeted for compromise based on whatever narrative is politically convenient without consideration of all reliable scientific data available.
Water fluoridation has long been used as a political weapon. Just as with the COVID ‘pandemic’, misinformation, propaganda and fear resulted in cowardly edicts by government and mass compliance of populations to medical experimentation using mass medication of products that are proven to be neither safe or effective. If governments and the bureaucrat class were so deeply concerned for our health, dental and oral or otherwise, and given the absolute data of whether fluoride is useful in maintaining oral health, they would offer fluoride supplements or dental care products to those that want them. Most responsible and informed adults would ensure that their families maintain good oral hygiene. The nanny state need not intervene. The dental industry is doing just fine with or without mass fluoridation. Why should we fluoridate the water we bathe or wash in or water our life sustaining plants with? Why should a known neurotoxin or any other medication, at any concentration, be added to such a vital necessity of life? If governments are sincerely concerned about the health of the people they are to serve, they would concentrate on access to nutritious and affordable food and a healthy economy instead of forcibly mass medicating the population against bad or malicious policy. Why not offer effective water filtration to people that don’t want to be mass medicated? How many politicians can and will afford to protect their families from their poisoned well programs? To not consider healthy alternatives to forced mass medication or informed consent strongly implies willfully blind or malicious intent.
Below are some links of many available scientific perspectives on this issue that might go against the often repeated status quo and flawed science narratives. Hopefully you can jointly give them ethical consideration.
Sincerely,
Al Neitsch
Airdrie, Alberta

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/what-is-fluoride-why-is-it-added-us-water-supply-2024-11-25
Fluoride: What is it and why does RFK Jr want it removed from water? Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who heads the Department of Health and Human Services, has said U.S. President Donald Trump will call for an end to adding fluoride to public water supplies. Trump has not …www.reuters.com |
Statements from European Health, Water, & Environment Authorities on Water Fluoridation – Fluoride Action Network Although the U.S. Centers for Disease Control hails water fluoridation as one of the “top ten public health achievements of the twentieth century,” most of the western world, including the vast majority of western Europe, does not fluoridate its water supply.At present, 98% of the western European population drinks non-fluoridated water. This includes: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, […]fluoridealert.org |
https://www.safewatercalgary.com
Fluoride Free | Safe Water Calgary We are a broad coalition of concerned citizens who believe that all Calgarians should have access to clean and safe public water. We believe in our right to make individual choices as to what goes into our bodies and those of our children. We are for fluoride and chemical free water!www.safewatercalgary.com |
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9819484
The Relationship between Fluoride Exposure and Cognitive Outcomes from Gestation to Adulthood—A Systematic Review – PMC – PubMed Central (PMC) Study Design. From the six longitudinal studies included in this systematic review, three studies (50%) [54,56,61] identified a significant negative association between fluoride exposure and cognition.While from the 40 cross-sectional included studies, 34 studies (85%) showed a significant negative association between fluoride and cognition.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov |
Archives
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- October 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
Calendar
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
31 |
Leave a Reply