Dear Elected and Unelected Officials
Poly Tics . Social Studies
To Our Elected and Un-elected Officials,
As governments start to ramp up the rollout and fear of the next wave of pandemic emergency narratives, it might be useful to consider a perspective of how governments reacted to phase one of the COVID experience and perhaps gain some insight on the dangers of further, proposed W.H.O. attacks on national sovereignty and personal bodily autonomy.
The following are excerpts from Bruce Pardy’s new book, ‘Canary in a COVID World : How Propaganda and Censorship Changed Our (My) World.
1.
Put another way : “Public good, is not an objective measure, like beauty, it lies in the eyes of the beholder. Since the administrative rests on its discretion to decide the public good, it alone can define what public good means. Policies make trade-offs. Trade-offs reflect values. Values are political, not factual. Evidence may be relevant but never determinative. An avalanche of data showing that electric cars provide no comparable environmental benefit will ot nullify rules that mandate the sale of electric vehicles. Through their own ideological lens, governments decide where the public interest lies.
Arguments challenging COVID policies abound. Lockdowns caused more harm than good. Masks did not prevent the spread of the virus. The MRNA vaccines were not vaccines, and their risks outweighed their benefits. Propaganda caused unnecessary fear. Medical censorship prevented doctors from speaking the truth. These objections miss the plot. They argue, using evidence of bad outcomes, that public good was not achieved. But state officials don’t have to show that their policies achieved public good, since the meaning of the public good is up to them.
Paradoxically, criticizing the state’s policies legitimizes its control. Alleging that lockdowns are bad because they cause harm implies that they are good if they work. Challenging vaccine mandates because vaccines are dangerous attacks the vaccines, not the mandates. If policies are bad only because they don’t work, they are good when they do.
When COVID madness descended, people thought the law would save them. Some found lawyers to challenge the rules. Some defied restrictions and disputed their tickets. These efforts failed to turn the ship around. Courts did not repudiate the pandemic regime. This is not surprising, since courts helped to establish the administrative state in the first place, long before there was a virus.
2.
With few exceptions, the problem is not the content of policy but it’s very existence. If lockdowns had succeeded, they would still have restrained people against their will. If COVID vaccines were safe and effective, mandates still take medical decisions away from individuals. These policies wrong for the coercion they imposed, not the goals they failed to achieve.
The conceit of our functionaries has become intolerable. Most public policy, good or bad, is illegitimate. No doubt there are subjects – foreign relations, public infrastructure – where government may be necessary. But these are exceptions to the general rule ; People’s lives are their own.
The following links might help with your discernment in guiding your level of compliance with any forthcoming policy, good or bad. More people are questioning government response to the last pandemic, especially now that information on the rising number of post vaccine injury and death casualties are being revealed. People are better informed and are adopting a ‘never again’ stance on what the non-government organizations will surely try to roll out in phase two of the pandemic and or even recent climate emergencies. Bear in mind that the original narratives released on the public were by and large proven to be false or at the very least misleading. That certain non-government agencies and elected governments are doubling down on the original narratives, and especially towards the most vulnerable such as the elderly and the very young, even the unborn, should be very concerning to all that want their families to live in a free and democratic society, under a secure Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, with a respect for bodily autonomy and a firm recognition of the Nuremberg Code.
There will have to a reckoning for the actions of the past government and corporate response to the COVID rollouts, very similar to the groundwork laid by the National Citizen’s Inquiry which crossed Canada in the last several months. Now, more than ever, accountability and transparency and truth and reconciliation will be key to rebuilding Canada and trust in our government and Democratic institutions.
Sincerely,
Al Neitsch
MIKKI WILLIS ON WORLD HEALTH SOVEREIGNTY SUMMIT 2023
Dr. McCullough’s Speech at the European Parliament
Full interview with retired Lieutenant Colonel David Redman on the COVID 19 pandemic lockdowns